Category Archives: Indigenous Religion and Philosophy

Fundamental Misunderstandings Lead to Fundamental Grief

2024 Trip to Eastern Canada, civilization, Colonialism, Indigenous People After Contact, Indigenous Religion and Philosophy

 

As I have been saying many of the problems between Indigenous Canadians and non-Indigenous Canadians are the result of misunderstandings in the past, and misunderstanding that have continued.

 

As a result of all of these misunderstandings, when many years later the Europeans approached the Indigenous people to make treaties, it was very difficult for their differing world views not to influence what they thought they were agreeing to. For example, Indigenous People thought they were agreeing to share the land while the newcomers thought the indigenous people were agreeing to cede or give up the land to the newcomers.  That very fundamental differing point of view has seriously disturbed relations between them ever since.

According to Barbara Huck,

“Though decision-making was by consensus, most North American cultures put great stock in individuals and lauded efforts on behalf of the community. Status was achieved not by owning property but by giving it away.  Religion permeated every aspect of their lives and was based on respect for the Earth and all living things.”

 

That did not mean all relations between Indigenous groups were peaches and cream. There were conflicts between groups. And those conflicts were real and sometimes vicious. Europeans did not have a monopoly on violence. Disputes between indigenous groups often turned violent and often escalated after that. Yet the overall attitudes of newcomers were radically different.

The world views of the Europeans were very different from that of Indigenous peoples.

As Huck said,

“The newcomers from Europe had a very different world view. Theirs was a class society, governed in an authoritarian way by men who viewed land and its resources as objects to be exploited. They greatly admired the accumulation of personal wealth and assigned positions of power to those who were particularly successful at amassing goods and money. Generosity was viewed as philanthropy, an act of charity, not necessity.”

 

Some of us may be surprised to find that Indigenous people were more democratic than the new comers.

There was another very important difference between the two groups. The Indigenous People saw themselves as part of the natural world, particularly identified with the land in which they lived. They had a deeply spiritual relationship to that natural world as a result. The Europeans saw the natural world as something to own individually and exploit.  Barbara Huck explained the European attitudes this way:

“Their primary allegiance was to the concept of the nation-state and national identity was closely tied to language, religion, and race. They believed implicitly in European superiority and felt compelled to try persuade other cultures to embrace their world view. Yet with few exceptions, Europeans proved woefully unprepared for survival in North America. The first 250 years of European contact were fraught with disorientation, disaster, and privation. Native North Americans provided guiding services, information, interpretation, clothing, medicine and food., as well as wives and extended families. All this was in addition to the furs that were the primary objects of early French and later British interest. And time after time, they rescued the newcomers from starvation. Yet Europeans never did comprehend that this spontaneous, culturally entrenched generosity required  reciprocity. Instead, native North Americans in need were termed beggars.”

 

To the natives of North America, reciprocity was not just a cardinal virtue, it was a religious principle. The newcomers did not catch on. They were prepared to accept gifts from the natives, but often failed to reciprocate when the opportunity arose.  Who is the more civilized? These differing attitudes prepared the ground for misunderstandings and eventually conflicts.  As Huck said in her book on the fur trade of North America,

“This climate of misunderstanding colored the fur trade and the progress of Europeans across the continent. From the 16th century St. Lawrence Valley to the Pacific Coast 300 years later, the pattern was repeated again and again. Recognizing it is fundamental to appreciating the profound changes that took place in North America, between 1550 and 1860, and perhaps just as important in understanding today’s attempts to rectify some of the mistakes of the past.”

 

This is where learning comes in. To learn from our mistakes is important. But to do that our mistakes must be honestly confronted. How else can we get better? Unfortunately, people are often reluctant to admit mistakes, and that makes matters worse. Not better.

 

European Savages

2024 Trip to Eastern Canada, civilization, Colonialism, History, Indigenous People After Contact, Indigenous Religion and Philosophy

On our trip across eastern Canada I had many opportunities to consider Canadian history.

The Indigenous people encountered by Europeans were definitely not savages.  They were members of sophisticated societies that all too often the Europeans did not well understand. Many of the Europeans were blinded by prejudice thinking that they could bring civilization and God to the barbarians and heathens. This was nonsense that the Europeans believed and passed on to their descendants and was largely responsible for the creation of white male supremacy favoured by their clans, but clearly absurd.  The indigenous people were civilized people and had a lot to teach the European newcomers while they were prepared to learn a lot from them as well. That is a wise attitude isn’t it?

It certainly was not true, as many Europeans thought, that this new land was empty of people. England, for example adopted the concept of terra nullius, a Latin phrase meaning “nobody’s land,” to justify their bloody claims. According to this theory, terra nullius included territory without a European recognized sovereign, where no one who counted lived.  Again, this was nonsense.

Contrary to such barbaric unfounded prejudices there were people all over the entire western hemisphere when Europeans arrived and these people mattered just as much as the visitors. The Europeans had no monopoly on civilization. In fact, often they revealed a startling lack of civilization. As Barbara Huck said in her book,

“Parts of North and Central America were among the most densely populated places on Earth. Some anthropologists have estimated the total population of the continent 500 years ago, including Mexico and Central America, at between 112 and 140 million. Mexico, the spectacular Aztec capital, was one of the three largest cities in the world when the Spaniards first laid eyes on it.

Much of Canada and the United States was considerably less populated than that—estimates put the total population of both between nine and 12 million—but North America was not, as some have imagined it, terra nullius, a land without people. And many societies, such as the Iroquoians, were healthier, more prosperous and less class-bound than their European counterparts of the same period.”

 

If first contact was indeed a case of civilization meeting barbarity, it is likely that the Europeans were the barbarians!  

It is also noteworthy, the Indigenous people who first encountered these Europeans in many ways did not share European attitudes and values. As Huck said,

“…the Americas were literally a world apart and North American values and beliefs were very different –in some ways almost directly contrary to the perspectives of the strangers who began to arrive on their shores in the early 1500s, the beginning of the contact period.”

 

For example, I have pointed out elsewhere that indigenous people of North American had views that were by no means all the same. They had many diverse views, just like Europeans.  The spiritual beliefs of indigenous people, for example, were very different from the newcomers, and in my view often preferable. We are of course, each entitled to our own views on that and I intend to continue commenting on those differences.

 

They also had very different views about how societies should be organized and how they should be governed and how wealth should be produced and shared. I find the differences profoundly interesting.  Barbara Huck in her book also commented on them:

 

“Indeed, it’s hard to imagine two more conflicting world views. Whether farmers or hunters, the vast majority of the people of what are now Canada and the United States lived communally in groups of varying sizes. The territories they inhabited were not owned, as we recognize land ownership, but rather commonly acknowledged  to be theirs to use. They governed by consensus, valued generosity and self-reliance, and loathed acquisitiveness and coercion. Stinginess and miserly behavior were strongly condemned. Almost everywhere it was considered immoral to allow anyone to go hungry if food was available.”

 

Not a bad way to live. Maybe the Europeans were the savages.

 

A Fundamental Misunderstanding

2024 Trip to Eastern Canada, civilization, Indigenous People After Contact, Indigenous Religion and Philosophy

 

When Europeans arrived in what they called, wrongly, “The New World,” they quickly encountered the people who already lived here. In fact, they had lived here for thousands of years and had done rather well at that.

The  indigenous people were shocked at how these newcomers from Europe were not as healthy as the people who lived here. The Europeans were shorter than the North Americans and much less healthy lives.  Added to that, the Indigenous People were shocked at the great inequality between the different newcomers. There were classes of people that did extremely  poorly while the elite lived extravagantly well.  The Indigenous people did not understand this. They thought this meant the newcomers were not really civilized. I think they were right.

The Indigenous People realized the newcomers had some good ideas. They had amazing technologies.  Guns, big ships, and horses to name a few. But the Europeans also had a lot to learn from the inhabitants.  They were not able to survive here without help from the native North Americans. At first, they learned quickly and well. In time the Europeans forgot how they needed help.

The indigenous people of North America knew how to live well in North America. Even though the continent had incredibly variable environments and circumstances, from freezing northern terrains, to lush forests, great plains, amazing deserts, and everything in between, the inhabitants new how to thrive. Not just survive. But thrive!

Barbara Huck in her wonderful book, Exploring the Fur Trade Routes of North America, which I have been reading on this trip described it this way:

“Europeans adopted a number of North American technologies such as snowshoes…toboggans, birchbark canoes, and pemmican, but largely misunderstood the continent’s cultures.”

 

And that misunderstanding has made all the difference. It has wreaked havoc. It has destroyed lives, including the lives of many young and vulnerable children. But, in my view at least, it is not too late to do better. We can do better. We must do better.

Indigenous People are talking a lot about land-based education. I like that idea. The land can teach us a lot. But only if we listen and learn. We must pay attention.

Inukshuk

2024 Trip to Eastern Canada, Affinity, art, Indigenous Religion and Philosophy

 

At Dixie Lake, not far past Kenora I stopped the car at a rest stop and strolled in the south side of the highway about a ¼ km along the highway shoulder. I noticed a proudly installed Inukshuk on the north side of the highway at the top of a granite wall created by blasting the top part to of the Canadian Shield.  For generations young boys and other miscreants have been painting information no one is interested in, onto the rocks beside the road. Things like their initials and the initials of their current girlfriends. They used to mar the countryside. Lately, government employees diligently try to paint over these markings as soon as possible. And they do a pretty good job.  Frankly, I consider the messages a desecration. Rarely do we see the graffiti anymore.

 

Building an Inukshut is an entirely other matter. I appreciate everyone of them I see. These I think honour the history of Canada and the places in which they are found. They are respectful. They don’t mar the countryside like painted initials.

But I like them for another reason. A more philosophical reason.

The word “inukshuk” means “in the likeness of a human.” For generations, Inuit have been creating these impressive stone markers on the immense Arctic and sub-Arctic landscapes of Canada to show others where they have been and sometimes to let others know where emergency food can be found. Inukshuks really serve more than one function. They are used to guide fellow travellers sort of like a modern GPS is used. Some warn strangers of dangers. Some help assisting hunters and other to mark sacred places.

Sometimes they show how the people are part of the land and the land is part of the people. Even rocks. After all, as Carl Sagan said, “we are all stardust.”

Humans were created out of the dust of ancient stars. Whenever I think of life that way I am in awe. Imagine that each one of us is created by dust sent into the atmosphere by the big bang billions of years ago.

Inukshuts are really just piles of rocks. Nothing more. But they are places where people show reverence to nature.   They show us how we are all connected. I consider them holy messages. The opposite of desecrations. They are spiritual manifestations created by artists to suggest those connections that are the essence of religion.

Missa Gai/Earth Mass

Buddhism, Indigenous Religion and Philosophy, New Attitude to Nature

 

Professor Moriarty tended his lecture by talking about an   album of music released by Paul Winter in 1982 called “Missa Gaia/Earth Mass”.  The title actually refers to two languages, Latin for the word missa which means mass (the religious service)  and gaia from the Greek which refers to Mother nature. The earth in others words. So Missa Gaia is a mass for the earth.

 

Winter became artist in residence at the Cathedral of St. John Divine in New York City which Moriarty referred to as “a great ship wreck of a Church.” It was one of the largest churches in the world, which naturally did not impress Professor Moriarty. “It may be the biggest but it’s not the most beautiful he said. The mass has been referred to as “an environmental liturgy of contemporary music.” It is performed annually at that church. The calls of wolves, whales and other animals are weaved into the pieces of music sometimes used as melody.

 

Moriarty also said it was exclesias down there. Where God has come down to earth. This comes from the Greek word Ekklēsia (gathering of those summoned).  It was where people gathered. Like the Greek agora, that I remember from my very first day in Athens many years ago  led by a wonderful woman—Maria. She pointed out the agora to us. The word exclesias also makes us think of the Carol “Gloria, in excelsis Deo!”

 

In the music the voices of whales are heard and the alt sax that is used imitates the voice of the whale. And the voice of the loon and the voice of the wolf. When you hear this, Moriarty says, everything is brought in from the cold. You hear whales and wolves singing parts of the mass. It is an earth mass. It is a mass for the earth. It makes the entire earth sacred. And when you hear a mass for the earth how could you ravage it. It is sacred after all.

The Missa Gaia, according to Moriarty, is also the place where the Buddha found enlightenment. Apparently, there is now a temple there where the people have built a temple and called it Buddgaya or Bodh Gaya which is a village in the north east Indian state of Bihar.  It is considered one of  the most important Buddhist pilgrimage sites and houses at an ancient Mahabodhi Temple Complex, that was built to commemorate the place where the Buddha attained enlightenment underneath a sacred Bodhi Tree.

 

The mass includes as text the Kyrie and the Agnus Dei. The mass is an environmental liturgy of contemporary music.  The “Kyrie” is derived from the call of a wolf, the “Sanctus” from the songs of humpback whales. Man literally learns how to sing from animals. Missa Gaia  is not just ecological it is also ecumenical. It wants to contain and include all voices of the earth. Many musical traditions are embraced by the Missa Gaia such as Gregorian chants  from the Middle Ages, Protestant hymns, Romantic organ music, African instruments, Latin American rhythms, elements of Gospel music, and even rock music.

The name “Missa Gaia” refers to the  “Gaia hypothesis” proposed by scientists Jame Lovelock and Lynn Margulis which provides that “the entire range of living matter on Earth, from whales to viruses, and from oaks to algae, could be regarded as constituting a single living entity, capable of manipulating the Earth’s atmosphere to suit its overall needs and endowed with faculties and power far beyond its constituent parts”.

 The Mass had been performed annually at the Cathedral of St. John the Divine at The Feast of St. Francis which is the blessing of the animals.

 

When St. Francis of Assisi referred to brother sun and sister moon he is really saying, says Moriarty, “I am the little brother.”  He is saying they are the great brother or sister.  He is not saying I am the great conqueror! He is not saying I am the ruler of the earth. He is saying we are kin! That brings us right back to the ideas of Chief Seattle and the indigenous people of North America and elsewhere. Now that is really a profound new attitude to the earth!

Moriarty asked a very pertinent question: “Why don’t we call the earth Buddgaya?” That it is an enlightened earth?” At least that the earth will one day be enlightened. Of course, he is really suggesting that it is not enlightened now. I think the reason that has not been done is that we need a completely new transformative attitude to nature. Only when we do that can we consider ourselves, or the earth we inhabit, enlightened. We have not yet earned the right to call us or the earth enlightened. Not yet.

If we can do that Moriarty says on Christmas night when he goes to the stable, he won’t have to say humans are alone in the earth. “I won’t be experiencing the awful desolation of us and them.” Until we are enlightened, we will be experiencing the awful alienation of us from the earth. “Maybe our mass has to become a Missa Gaia. When we walk the earth we must realize we are walking in Buddgaya.

Then finally we will be walking beautifully upon the sacred earth.

 

 

An Irish Stream

Indigenous Religion and Philosophy, New Attitude to Nature

 

Professor Moriarty  told a story about a man in Dingle in the south west of Kerry on a lovely gorgeous evening when the mountains were almost heart-breakingly lovely and blue on a silent, silent evening. The only sound was the sound of a stream tumbling down the mountainside. An old man said, “It is calling us down into eternity out of which it is itself coming.” According to Moriarty this eternity is not behind time it is an eternity that is right there in front. It is right in front of you. It is unhidden.

It is the same eternity that Wordsworth talked about in the intimations of Immortality and that Traherne talked about. So the corn is the orient and immortal wheat.

Moriarty contrasts that with the end of the 19th century when white people were scattering around the American continent  in pursuit of Manifest Destiny. They came upon the holy sacred mountains of the Sioux Indians. As Moriarty said, “an old life, a sacred life was being destroyed there.” Of course, the same thing was happening everywhere across this great continent.  Non-indigenous people were destroying nature in pursuit of economic advantage.

In California a man rose up to the heavens during an eclipse where he learned a sacred dance that later came to be called the Ghost dance. The dancers would fall into a sort of trance. It was an apocalyptic dance, according to Moriarty. They were dancing in circles. According to Moriarty. And they were dong it everywhere.

As Moriarty said,

“they were going to roll up the whole white world that we had brought with us in the way you would roll up a carpet, from the Chicagos  and New Yorks and then the North American continent would return to the way it originally was. We know Europeans who treat corn as an economic commodity  and have to undertake a ghost dance ourselves. Ghost dance was what Wordsworth called their light of common day out of our eyes. Ghost dance is what Traherne called the dirty devices of the world. The philosophical assumptions and axioms. Ghost dance the Medusa mind set, the European mind set out of our eyes.”

 

 

Moriarty wants us to walk “enfranchised on an enfranchised earth.”  We need to be liberated. Then we can be in a paradise that is not “out there”, but down here where we are. All we have to do is “ghost dance the dirty devices out of our world.”

Moriarty believes this could bring about a new and reborn agriculture.  It would no longer be just an economic thing. According to him, “our eyes have become economic tumours.” When we look at things in that way, we are committing a sin Moriarty says. That is why we must comb them out just the way Takana Kapsalut’s hair had to be combed out of the sins of the people. We need the ghost dance in Europe.

 

Moriarty railed against the ancient and long-standing tendency of humans to try to shape nature, rather than allowing nature to shape us. “Sometimes,” Moriarty said, “I think we have gone the wrong way. We have gone the disastrous way and the world is paying a terrible price for that.”  This is exactly what I have been saying. We desperately need a new attitude to nature. It is like Prometheus who stole technological fire from heaven. The whales and dolphins instead went into the water where there was no fire. They did not want to go the technological way. As Professor Moriarty said, “They did not go the way of technological domination of the earth. They said to the world shape us.”

 

Moriarty says he has problems with the idea of the transcendence of God and domination of the earth. It often seems that this is now impossible. No one can go the way of the whales and dolphins anymore, though Moriarty hopes that some people can still do this. We believe that somehow, we have given permission to do to the earth what we are doing. Moriarty has problems with that view. He too wants a new attitude to nature.

A Sacred Navajo Cradle

Indigenous Religion and Philosophy, New Attitude to Nature

Professor Moriarty in his YouTube lecture, imagines the original great people who settled in Ireland and they brought with them sacred objects.  Then he imagines a new settler coming to Ireland and bringing a sacred Navajo cradle. He said, “A Navajo cradle is different from our cradle but it is still a cradle.”

Three is a Navajo Cradle song about a man making a cradle for his child.

“A Navajo Cradle

I have made a cradle board for you my child

May you grow to a great old age,

Of the sun’s rays I made the back

Of black clouds I have made a blanket

Of rainbow I have made the bow,

Of sunbeams I have made the side lopes,

Of lightning I have made the lacings

Of river mirrorings I have made the footboard,

Of dawn I have made the covering,

Of light on high horizons have I made the bed.”

 

Like Professor Moriarty, my wife Christiane and I have experienced stories from Navajo story tellers. I think in particular of one who gave us a spectacular jeep ride through Canyon de Chelly in northern Arizona. We learned a lot from him.  Professor Moriarty also learned a lot from the Navajo.

As Moriarty concluded about that Cradle Song:

“This is a cradle that all of us need. No matter what age we are, where young or old, male or female, it is a cradle we should all be willing to lie down into. We would be lying down to great creative nature. We would be lying down into the creative genius of the universe. In this cradle we can experience ecological second birth. We Europeans who think of ourselves as belonging to the first world and look upon the Navajo as belonging to the third world. It sometimes appears to me that we are living in a spiritual third world. Instead of having potbellies we have pot-bellied hearts and minds because we aren’t being nourished any longer by our culture. We aren’t being spiritually nourished and our seals breathing holes have closed over. Think of this whole evening [he was talking to adults listening to his lecture] as a journey to this Navajo cradle. A cradle in which we might all lie down in and be born again…God bless the first peoples of the world if we are willing to listen to them. Then we might listen and learn to stand and walk beautifully on the earth.”

 

You can see from Moriarty’s words that he is as much a poet as a teacher or professor. We learn a lot: We can be born again. We can walk beautifully on the earth again.We can make America and Canada great again, but just not the way some politicians claim

 

 

Big Medicine

Indigenous Religion and Philosophy, New Attitude to Nature

 

Professor John Moriarty talked about a North American indigenous story about a small mouse that learned from a buffalo and a wolf that the world was a world was of medicine. The buffalo and the wolf led the mouse to the edge of a river that was the medicine river. It was filled with Big Medicine and it saved and healed a sick mouse. Some indigenous people have learned this, he says, during a vision quest.

He contrasts this with average Europeans. As Moriarty says,

“when the average European stands up in the morning he sees an economic opportunity. When the average native American stands up he sees Big Medicine. The Earth is Big Medicine. Everything in it is medicine. Isn’t it a wonderful way to see the world and get in touch with it as medicine? We are destroying the medicines that would heal us.”

 

 

Again, Moriarty contrasts the European vision and the Native American vision:

“The European vision is to see God as transcendent. God is above us. God is out there.”  The Greek vision is to see the earth as divine. If you see the world that way you will be reluctant to put a scythe to it. And he says, “I am on the side of the Divine. I won’t abuse it in the way I won’t abuse a chalice. God is transcendent but God is also imminent.”

 

Such an attitude makes all of nature sacred.

The Origin of Agriculture: An Ojibwa Story

Indigenous People before Contact, Indigenous Religion and Philosophy, New Attitude to Nature

 

This is an Ojibwa story about the origin of agriculture among a people of great hunters. A young man or boy was taken out by his grandfather to a Vison Quest.  A vision pit was dug for him and he had to stay there in the wilderness for 4 days and 4 nights without food.

His grandfather and grandmother prayed for him, but before he went in he had to undergo rites of purification in the sweat lodge. It was hoped his dream would have healing in it or medicine. But this boy had no dreams so when he was done a Sky Being came down to visit him in tassels and plumes and they wrestled all day.

Even though the boy was weak from lack of food and water, under neath him there was tremendous earth strength. When he wrestled the Sky Being it was like the earth and the sky were wrestling together.

This happened for 3 days and they wrestled each day. The Sky Being had weakened from the exercise and was about to die and asked to be buried and asked the boy and his father to tend to his grave and keep it clear of weeds. As a result, there grew corn in the grave and it looked like in tassels and plumes. This is how corn became so important to Ojibwa people. In some sense at least it is how they moved from the Hunter Gatherer stage to the stage of agriculture. In the story the corn is born out of a person. It is not from a person like ourselves but it is a person from the sky.  In this way, “agriculture is born out of a wrestling of heaven and earth.”  That is a fabulous story.

 According to Professor Moriarty, in Ancient Greece, the corn was also a person. In fact this is the Mediterranean tradition. Moriarty explained that

“In Greece the corn was a divinity and the earth was Gaia another divinity. In the Old Testament God is totally transcendent. Sometimes that is unfortunate because it means that all value is now in the super celestial world. All value is divine value and it’s in super celestial world. And that means that the earth is basically just raw material and we can only   look at it with an economic eye. But in this vision of it, the earth it itself a goddess. And the corn is a goddess. If the corn is a goddess than I am going to treat it sacredly. I am going to respond sacredly to it. When I take my sickle to the garden, I know that I am cutting down the goddess. When I broadcast the seed I know that it will grow into the goddess. But we have totally de-personalized corn. It has just become another economic proposition—economic material for us. And that is a pity.”

 

Now from the European perspective  that is a new attitude to nature.

A Sacred Inuit Story

Indigenous Religion and Philosophy, New Attitude to Nature

 

Professor Moriarty told a sacred Inuit Story. He said he could only do that if he did so with great reverence, for if you do that you can remove “a Berlin wall of misunderstandings between peoples.” Takana Kapsalut[1]  was the name of an Inuit woman. Her father was angry with her for not having a mate and threw her out of the kayak. When she tried to hang on he chopped off her fingers which then floated on the surfaced of the ocean as she sunk to the bottom.

 

This was the creative dream time of the beginning. Her fingers became mammals of the sea. She is the mother of sea beasts. When people on the earth don’t walk in the great imagination or don’t walk beautifully on the earth, when they sin, and when they do things against the Great Imagination a wall of anger grows around her on the ocean floor no seals will rise up at the breathing holes. As a result, people are hungry so they visit a Great Shaman who takes a journey to the ocean floor and he will go through various states of mind on his journey down for his state of mind will be equal to the state of mind of the earth.

 

The Shaman climbs a ladder up a cliff, but the rungs are turned like knives. He wants to go across the river but this is a trap for on the other side is an evil person, a witch. The wall of anger is meant to protect Takana Kapsalut and the shaman sings in the voice of whale, the voice of a wolf, and in all the voices of nature. That helps dissolve the wall of anger and makes the journey of the Shaman successful so the people can again go and hunt successfully and end the hunger of the people.

 

Takana Kapsalut is the mother of archetypes and she walks beautifully on the earth and rescues it. Takana Kapsalut is the mistress of life or the mother of life. But we in Europe, according to Moriarty have not walked in the great imagination. In the depths of our psyches “which is one with the universe anyway,” says Moriarty. Somewhere there is a mother of archetypes or a mother of great visons. Only someone who takes a great journey down the depths of his or her own psyche and sings there with a whale voice and dolphin voice understands that  “ the great life can emerge up again into us and again arise into the surface consciousness so that we will again be walking within the great Imagination and the great world.”

In the 20th century not many of us can do this. Instead, as Teilhard de Chardin said,

 

“we will walk in the “noise sphere”. We don’t hear the Great Imagination coming out of our televisions and our radios We are walking in our desert of Zin. No we are not blessed. Like the children of Israel our souls have dried away.

 

Moriarty said we need someone to go down to the bottom of the ocean to the floor of the psyche and sing there with the commonage voice with voices of nature and comb out Takana Kapsalut’s hair to comb out the sins of the people against grass, against elk, and all the creatures of the world against whom we have waged war. We need to comb out Cartesianism, comb out our Medusa mindset and comb out our economics. We need a entirely new attitude to nature. One that is foreign to European consciousness.

 

Then perhaps we can walk on the soil of Europe again the way our Paleolithic ancestors walked among the animals of the earth.  This is not walking among the animals to declare war on them. They walked among the animals in commonage consciousness. Then we can again walk on the earth in a great and sacred way.  This is what the Inuit story urges us to do.

 

[1] I am not sure how to spell the name