Will Braun who taught the course that Christiane and I took at Canadian Mennonite University 2 years ago said that “we are all God’s Children.” He is a Christian and to him that is a fundamental principle. God loves all of us. Not just the Christians who go to church. Not just Christians. He also loves Buddhists, Hindus, Muslims, and people who don’t love him back or even believe he exists. I suspect a lot of modern Christians don’t agree with Braun. I find it easier to believe that many of them hate Muslims for example. At least that is what their actions suggest. They don’t even treat Muslims with respect let alone love. Some claim to love them but I just don’t believe them because their words and actions suggest otherwise.
In fact, it seems to me many Americans hate Muslims. Many hate Jews or blacks or indigenous people. Again, they might claim to love them, but to me it seems more likely that they hate them. Perhaps even more obviously, many Americans hate Democrats. And Many Americans hate Republicans. They hate them because they are on the “other side”. And they can’t stand the other side in many cultural disputes. They hate gays or lesbians, or heterosexuals. They hate whites or blacks. They hate, often with surprising viciousness, those on the other side of their important cultural and political debates.
About a year ago or so, Charlie Kirk was murdered. He was loved on the right, but not so much on the left. In fact, it seemed if the right loved him the left would have to hate him. He was immediately attacked on the left and defended on the right. People took sides. And those sides were sacred. No one gives up on what they think is sacred. At least it is very difficult, if it is not impossible.
Some have called this “binary thinking.” Mark Edmundson said this in an article in the New York Times: “Look around: Binary thinking (often informing binary rage) is everywhere in our country.”
One person who resisted binary thinking was Van Jones an occasional commentator on CNN. This is what he said about Kirk: “I was very frustrated with people in my party throwing rocks at the corpse before he could even be buried.” According to Edmundson, “Mr. Kirk was on the other team, and in binary-thinking America, that meant he was a foe.”
I think he was right. Not all teams work that way, but increasingly political teams do. You are almost required to hate the other team to stay on your team. You risk shunning if you don’t hate enough. Religious groups used to work that way too, but thankfully, many of them are moving in the other direction.
At Charlie Kirk’s funeral service his widow said, demonstrating Christian principles in action, that she did not hate the man who killed her husband. She said she forgave him. That is uncommon. Donald Trump was very different. This is what Trump said,
“Mr. Kirk did not hate his opponents. He wanted the best for them. That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponents, and I don’t want the best for them.”
Kirk and his wife were followers of Trump, but they did not follow him down this path. When leaders do the wrong thing we should not follow them. That is unusual in modern politics, particularly politics that are as polarized as American politics, and increasingly, Canadian politics which is going down the same path as Trump, not Kirk.
I recently attended a conference that was attended by many religious people of various religions and they all got along respectfully. It was great to see. Pluralism in action. This is a big improvement over the “good old days”, that were really not always so good. I hope we don’t start back-sliding. Extremism is really not often attractive. Often its ugly. Just watch Trump. Or the extremists on the left for that matter.
There is a better way.

















