Curiosity: An Unlikely Superpower

 

Curiosity is an unlikely super power. For us and our species. It can help to bridge gaps. If we genuinely want to learn from the other, we are not likely to hate the other. We can appreciate the other and make it easier to learn from her or him.

 

If polarization is a problem, as many of us believe it to be, how can we address that problem? Here are some options Will Braun offered us in our class. Some possible strategies:

 

  1. We can yell. Denounce. Cancel. Bash. We can be like the person holding a gun, gazing at the horizon, and as soon as they appear we can shoot them down. This is actually quite common. In what world are these strategies helpful?

 

  1. We can argue and reason with the other. But when was the last time an argument from the other side convinced you of anything? When was the last time I convinced someone from the other side of anything?  Frankly, I can’t remember any successes. Evidence indicates that failure is common; success almost non-existent. Studies have shown the more facts you give the other side the less likely you are going to persuade them to change their minds. Argument seems futile.

 

  1. Use sophisticated jargon. This is very common on the left, though it happens too on the right. The left has their language and analysis and so does the right. The left talks about bias, racism, exploitation and things like that. The right accuses the other of being woke, that is the latest way of dismissing the left. Again, this usually causes the other side to entrench and never come out again.

 

  1. Fight like hell. You can try to be strategic, smart, learned, and effective and you end up being none of those things. Another exercise in futility.

 

  1. Listen. Now this option has possibilities. Are you not curious about what the other will say and think and do? Curiosity can be a super power. Will Braun did not use this language. It is mine. If you go to the other side and say I want to learn from you. I want to hear what you are saying. For most of us this is very hard. Braun admitted it was hard for him. But something happens when you change to this approach. It really is a superpower. It often takes courage to make the first move to approach the other side with curiosity. As Braun said, “This can turn down the temperature.”

 

 

Braun said he has a friend who is a strong Trump supporter and lives in Texas. The two of them though can talk to each other, with the temperature lowered. They disagree with each other, but they do so respectfully because they remain friends. As a result, they are each less likely to demonize each other. Braun said, “Then you hold some tension. If instead you say, screw all those other people I am letting go, then the tension snaps like a rubber band.” It is gone. Then you go to your side and the other goes to her side. Does that create a better society? Braun argues that for the longer term it does not. It does not help the weak and vulnerable. They are not better off.

Dissenting from Racism

 

Recently there was a public example of racism in our community. Someone placed a banner hanging over an overpass so that oncoming traffic would see it. The banner read, “Steinbachers vote white, not brown.” Steinbach had at least 2 candidates from racial minorities. It was done publicly so that as many people as possible would see. It was a clear expression of white supremacy. Christiane and I thought it was important that white people express their dissent from these racist views.  How else do people of brown skin know that we don’t agree with this viewpoint?  We thought it was important to let them know they were not alone in a sea of racists.  That was why we sent this letter to our local newspaper:

 

“Sadly, recent events have made it clear that our home town of Steinbach has been dragged into hateful racism by the rhetoric of ignorant and hateful people.  It is time for all Steinbachers to step up and support all members of our community. Whenever the opportunity arises we must let the haters know that they don’t speak for us. This is no time for any of us to acquiesce to such actions by our silence. We must all speak up. Those of us who have information about the perpetrators should pass that information on to the police.  Those who know members of racial minorities in the community should make it clear we denounce such actions. There is no place in Steinbach for such hate.”

 

 

I am not trying to say Christiane and I did anything great or heroic. I just think it’s important to let racists know that we don’t agree with them and victims of racism know that we are not on the side of the racists.  And I do wish more people would speak up. Acquiescing to racists by silence is not a helpful. It encourages them.

 

Where is America’s Soul?

 

Recently, Trump was bragging about a deal he made with Putin for Americans to buy diesel from Russia, no doubt hoping to reduce diesel prices in the US before the upcoming midterm elections. In the past many American political leaders have given Trump a pass when Trump cozied up to Putin. Not this time.

 

Trump and Putin have a special relationship.  It has been so close that for a while some Democrats believed Putin had Trump in his pocket.   However, recently, a number of American politicians, on a bi-partisan basis wrote a letter to Donald Trump. 6 Republicans signed the letter along with 6 Democrats. Such agreement is very rare these days.  These political leaders urged Trump to rescind the deal.

The 12 Republicans and Democrats used some strong language in condemning the deal.  They pointed out that such a deal at this time damages America’s security interests and “is a betrayal of the people of Ukraine, who continue to defend themselves from Putin’s murderous, illegal war.”  It also said, “This deal is a gift to our adversary and a betrayal of our Allies; it should be rescinded.”  But it looks like nothing will deter Trump in his quest to reduce American diesel prices and to help Trump avoid his party losing the election and him having to deal with a Democrat controlled House and Senate, which could make life uncomfortable for Trump. CBC News called it, “an astonishing betrayal of Ukraine by Donald Trump.”

But the words of the political leaders were strong, even if more self-serving than completely true: “For decades, America has stood as the bastion of freedom against tyranny, and American presidents have embodied our nation’s resistance to tyrants. Putin is a tyrant.” Actually, America has often supported dictators, but perhaps never so cravenly as this.

Chrystia Freeland, Canada’s former deputy Prime Minister had some really interesting things to say about this deal. She urged Americans to pay serious attention to what was happening when she said, “This is a Rubicon moment and I hope America recognizes it and will recognize more is at stake than Ukraine. I think America’s soul is at stake.”

Personally, I fear America’s soul has long since vanished.

Personal Life back in the Bible Belt for John Neufeld

 

I know whereof Will Braun spoke, when he told our class about his trepidation about moving back to the Bible Belt near Winkler Manitoba. I had exactly the same experience, moving back to the south eastern Bible belt of Steinbach after 7 years of university. I dragged my lovely exotic French wife, Christiane with me. And she was fearful of what this move would mean. It was a big change from life in the big smoke. But she was brave and came with me.  She might not have realized how anxious I was about this move too. I had never intended to come back to Steinbach, but all of a sudden it just happened, when the local lawyer hired me right out of law school. I was not at all sure whether or not I would fit in either. Most of my friends were gone. Not many of us came back from University, at least so it seemed to me at the time. And just like Will Braun, the people here seemed strange, because they were so different from the people I have been living with in the past 7 years. But I was thrown into the deep end, as was Christiane, even more than I.

 

I think Braun had it easier than I did. He had kept his faith more or less intact, and both of our communities were places where faith, or lack of faith was vitally important. I kept my doubts more or less to myself and my close friends who understood this. My alienation was quiet but deep.  Here Braun and I were in similar conditions.

 

It took a while, but gradually I started to realize that I did not have all the answers about these people in the country—these people that were largely from the Bible belt.  I particularly felt this in Niverville a small town that at first seemed very conservative to me.  My boss had asked me to work there every Wednesday night.  Many of those people were from Paraguay or Mexico or other places in South America. They mainly spoke low German, a language I had to learn on the job. They wanted to speak low German and I tried to speak it. I was grateful when they did not laugh at my broken low German with German and English words mixed in. They liked it that I tried. That’s all they needed.

 

I got to know these people and I got to like them. We had different viewpoints but that did not matter. I realized they were good people. People I could trust. Of course, with some rare exceptions. We were not that different after all. They had much more conservative views than I did.  But I was no better than them. I still kept my views, as did they, but we could get along.

 

John O’Donoghue was right: “Part of the awakening of any life, is the arrival of contradiction within that life…It is sometimes in the most unusual places that you discover the gift of the beautiful.” These contradictions arrived in my life, and I had to accept them.

 

I remember many years later, after I had been working in Niverville for decades. I had worked there one day a week only because I had a busy practice in Steinbach.  I reluctantly came to realize I would have to turn that practice to another young lawyer who had more time and could devote his whole time and attention to the practice there. He has never looked back.

 

I remember too when that happened how sad my secretary was. She said she loved working with those people from Niverville. She was a town girl from Steinbach but she would miss them. I was surprised. But I realized I felt exactly the same way. The contradictions had melted away.

 

Personal Life back in the Bible Belt for Will Braun

 

Our facilitator for the course Christiane and I took at Canadian Mennonite University, as part of their outreach to old people, was Will Braun. He gave us his opinions of to live a modern life in a fractured and polarized society. And he encouraged us to make our own thoughts on the subject.

A few years ago he and his young family moved into the southern Manitoba Bible Belt where he really felt in some ways out of place, even though he grew up there.

 

 

Braun moved back to his old home town and wanted to live in the country a little bit off the grid. They wanted to do a little bit of farming. Alternative living, grow your own food and live a simple life. The rural dream. He thought it was difficult because he believed he and his family did not really fit in. Most people had different values than he and his family had. He said, “it was hard not to feel judgmental and somewhat isolated.”

 

They had worked hard building up their barn that became the centre piece of their new rural life. Then one day, that barn caught fire and to him it felt their “ethical high ground went up in smoke.” He knew the smoke going up was a high dose of greenhouse gas emissions. And they were left with a big pile of toxic garbage. Their life reduced to rubble. It tore Brown apart and it was a low point of his life.

 

But then one day, his neighbours showed up. He had “considerable difficulty” with some of those neighbours, but here they were with their equipment prepared to help. “They didn’t even want a thank you.”  It’s just what neighbours do, particularly in the country. One guy he had trouble with brought him bales, without being asked. Braun began to see these people were not one sided. They were rounded, full, and complex. Not need for treating them like card board cutouts. Polarization had not place here. They were good people, even if not perfect. It did not matter that they have very conservative views. It was good.

 

Here was the arrival of contradiction, as O’Donoghue called it. Braun thought he had some things figured out, and these people were not part of that answer. Yet here they were. He still thinks these people had some things wrong, that he had right. This is a strongly held viewpoint. But he could not dismiss these people or write them off or think that somehow he was better than that. That was not possible.

 

Here Will Braun was feeling low, and vulnerable, and beat up, and he had to deal with big contradiction. This was the fundamental contradiction: People are good and bad at the same time. Just like me. It was no more complicated than that. And as well, Braun had to understand what O’Donoghue said, “It is sometimes in the most unusual places that you discover the gift of the beautiful.” For Braun, the arrival of contradiction was a precious arrival, just as O’Donoghue said it was.

The Gentle Revolution.

 

Will Braun always meandered towards the gentle. That, largely, is what I liked so much about the talks he facilitated with us at Canadian Mennonite University. He avoided the extremes. He was a gentle man. And he did it largely without preaching.  He reminded me of what I knew about Vaclav Havel and his velvet revolution. I always admired Havel too.

 

Havel was part of the amazing revolution in Czechoslovakia that brought down the mighty Soviet Empire that seemed invincible and it seemed it would last forever. Then for 11 days from November17 to 28 1989 the people in Czechoslovakia resisted that immense one-party government. The one party was of course the Communist Party that was backed by the Communist party in Russia. In 11 days the 41-year single party government collapsed largely without bloodshed. How was that possible?

 

The 1989 event triggered a series of anti-Communist demonstrations.  The people had basically never demonstrated against communist rule.  The government was just too powerful.  At least until it wasn’t.  On November the group of protesters swelled from 200,000 the previous day to 500,000. People feared the worst, but did not relent.  On November 24, 1989 the entire group of communist leadership resigned.  On November 27, 1989 a two-hour general strike was held. It involved nearly all working people in Czechoslovakia.

It was a remarkable non-violent revolution. It came to be called the Velvet Revolution. In those 11 days The world saw (and soon forgot) how powerful a non-violent revolution could be. The communist party gave up its monopoly on power. The barbed wire fences at the borders with West Germany and Austria came down. An interim government was appointed and actually resigned after elections were held in 1990. Czechoslovakia peacefully split into 2 countries the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic when the 2 major ethnicities did not get along well. But they negotiated it. Warfare was not necessary. In part that was because they had strong leaders. Havel was a strong leader, not like so many of our current leaders who  boast about being  strong leaders but have no idea how to be one.

Václav Havel was a Czech statesman, author, poet, playwright, and dissident. Havel served as the last president of Czechoslovakia from 1989 until 1992. He really did not want to be a political leader. He wanted to be a writer more. He agreed to be a leader  for only a few years. He was a true statesman.

On New Years Day, in 1991 he gave a wonderful short speech in which he expressed a few very interesting ideas. He said wanted a new type of politics—one based on morality. What a crazy idea? He said his country would have to learn that new type of politics. He said,

“politics does not have to be the art of the possible, especially if this means the art of speculating, calculating, intrigues, secret agreements, and pragmatic maneuvering, but that it also can be the art of the impossible, that is the art of making both ourselves and the world better.”

 

In that speech he also considered what his country had most to fear. He said, “Our worst enemy today is our own bad qualities—indifference to public affairs, conceit, ambition, selfishness, the pursuit of personal advancement, and rivalry—and that is the main struggle we are faced with.”  He then concluded his remarks by telling his countrymen about the upcoming free election which he referred to as a battle,  and urged  his people like this: “Let us not allow that battle to sully the still clean face of our gentle revolution….”

 He did not want a battle of the extremes. He wanted a gentle revolution. He was a man of humility. He knew how powerful the powerless could be a called it The Power of the Powerless.

We need more leaders like that. We don’t need those who are filled with bombast.

Taylor Sheridan: The Wolf

 

 

 

Taylor Sheridan is a great writer.  He has written many very successful films and TV series. Probably his most well-known is the series Yellowstone. But he written many.  They are all interesting.

 

Sheridan likes to play with ideas in his art. I like such stories. I find ideas very exciting. I think many people feel that way, although many of them don’t realize it. They think they like action, and they do, but they also like action spiced with ideas.  Ideas is part of what attracts people to the films of Taylor Sheridan. Not just violence or action.

 

Sheridan’s earlies film which attracted fa lot of favourable attention was called Sicario.  It was an action film. I admit it; I loved it. In that film, Alejandro Gillick was played by Benicio del Toro. He was a very tough former Mexican prosecutor turned CIA assassin.

 

In the film he has a chilling conversation with  Kate Macer, an idealistic FBI officer played by Emily Blunt. Kate was an officer from Chandler Arizona, near where Christiane and I spent nearly a decade of winters a few years ago. That made it more chilling to me when I saw the film.

 

Alejandro tells Kate, “You should move to a small town near to where the rule of law still exists. You will not survive here. You are not a wolf. And this is the land of wolves now.”

 

Sheridan is full of ideas like that. I don’t agree with all of them. That’s for sure. I don’t agree that the rule of law exists only in small towns. Or that all morality which exists does so only in small towns. Such an idea is attractive to Sheridan. It is repeated many times in his films. His idea is repeated ad nauseum in one of his latest series The Madison. I don’t believe all the wolves are in the cities. That is an illusion. To some it is a comfortable illusion.

 

Actually, there are a lot of wolves out there. Sheridan also believes, that for good guys to fight the bad guys they have to become bad. Otherwise, their battle will be hopeless. I know I am naïve. I still don’t believe that even though Sheridan’s films sometimes make it seem obviously true. Kate also has trouble with the argument. But I must admit Sheridan makes his films exciting. Watching ideas like that play out can be entertaining.

 

I think there are a lot of wolves out there. I just don’t think they are scared to go into small towns.

 

 

Crises of Democracy are not Unprecedented

 

People should not be surprised when there is a crisis in democracy. People should be surprised when there is none. As the American political philosopher Robert Kagan said:

 

“The American Revolution did not just produce a new system of government dedicated to the protection of the rights of all individuals against government and community, the first of its kind in history. It also produced a reaction against those very liberal principles by slaveholders and their white supporters, by religious movements, by those many Americans who have sought to preserve ancient, traditional hierarchies of peoples and beliefs against the leveling force of liberalism.”

 

Many Canadians and Americans want to deny that this is part of their history. They do so at the peril of democracy, which cannot survive without constant support. As Robert Kagan showed, this tension between liberalism and illiberalism has dominated America, and it has likewise dominated Canada, and looking away from that reality is dangerously foolish. Democratic crises are part of our lifeblood. They are in our DNA.

 

Kagan called the notion that all Americans share a commitment to the founding principles of the country “a pleasant myth, or perhaps a noble lie.”

 

As he could have said equally about Canadians, he pointed out that,

 

“We prefer to believe we all share the same fundamental goals and only disagree on the means of achieving them. But, in fact, large numbers of Americans have always rejected the founders’ claim that all men are created equal, with ‘unalienable’ rights to liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and they have persistently struggled against the imposition of those liberal values on their lives. Great numbers of Americans, from the time of the Revolution onward, have wished to see America in ethnoreligious terms, as fundamentally a white, Protestant nation whose character is an outgrowth of white, Christian, European civilization. Their goal has been to preserve a white, Christian supremacy, contrary to the founders’ vision, and they have tolerated founders’ liberalism and the workings of the democratic system, only when it has not undermined that cause. When it has, they have repeatedly rebelled against it.”

 

That is why he called his book Rebellion. The rebellion he described and saw repeatedly, was an illiberal rebellion. It was a rebellion repeated over and over again by men—usually men—who wanted to preserve their privileges over those perceived as being “beneath” them. They never believed in equality. They believed in hierarchies with themselves and their kin and their fellow travelers at the top, in natural positions of dominance and privilege. This rebellion has repeatedly expressed itself as backlash. Over and over again every liberal step forward was followed by backlash, even when there was no over reach in the first place. These backlashes were not always corrections. That was always just a myth of the favoured minorities. And these myths must always be guarded against for they can hide the truth. And the truth must always be faced, no matter how uncomfortable.

 

The truth is that a lot of Americans, and Canadians, like their hierarchies, no matter how much they claim otherwise.