Category Archives: Indigenous–Indian Residential Schools

Ideal for diseases; for children not quite

 

According to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC ) report of 2021,

For Aboriginal children, the relocation to residential schools was generally no healthier than their homes had been on the reserves. In 1897, Indian Affairs official Martin Benson reported that the industrial schools in Manitoba and the Northwest Territories had been hurriedly constructed of poor materials, badly laid out, without provision for lighting, heating, or ventilation.” In addition, drainage was poor, and water and fuel supplies were inadequate. Conditions were not any better in the church-built schools.”

 

The TRC reported how schools were selected without proper regard for either water supply or drainage. “Students’ health depended on clean water, good sanitation, and adequate ventilation.  But little was done to improve the poor living conditions that were identified at the beginning of the twentieth century.” Schools also were frequently not just dilapidated but “acute fire hazards,” according to R.A Hoey, not some left wing radical, but a man who had served as Indian Affairs Superintendent of Welfare and Training.  He said schools were generally of faulty construction and often failed to meet the minimum standards in the construction of public buildings, particularly institutions for the education of children.”

These were dreadful conditions for children to live in, but they were ideal conditions for diseases such as tuberculosis and others to flourish. Then, we must remember, Canada required many indigenous people to send their children to these schools. They could be imprisoned for disobeying this requirement. Children were often rudely yanked out of loving homes and sent to these fire traps “for their own good.”  What kind of good is that?

Imagine taking children from homes where they were loved to what were called residential schools or even industrial schools. Think about it.

 

Wisdom From Lori

 

Judge Brian Giesbrecht said it was time for indigenous people to move on. I know that sentiment is shared by many Canadians. It is very common among privileged Canadians.

Such statements are not just disingenuous, but also plain old fashioned ignorant. Compare this with the wisdom, understanding and deep empathy of my cousin Lori—one of the good people who are not blinded by privilege—who posted it on my blog. I am reposting it because I fear too many did not read it.

 

“Even though my maternal family was starved, beaten and most of them, including my grandfather, killed by Stalin, and, my grandmother, mother and her siblings , mere children, were forced to walk from Ukraine through Poland to reach Germany where they were imprisoned in forced labour and concentration camps and starved again, and even though the Canadian government who took them in as immigrants and made them pay back their passage, and the Canadian Government took away my people’s right to speak their own language and ignored their signed treaty to provide schooling in their own language, which led to me never being able to learn and speak my own language, and even though those events have coloured every minute of my entire life, I cannot pretend to understand the enormity of the experiences of indigenous Canadian people who endured these sorts of tortures and more, AND DID NOT HAVE THE ADVANTAGE OF WHITE SKIN or European heritage to give them even one advantage in their recovery from their experiences.
I can understand and support the healing efforts now being made by indigenous culture, and hope that someday we will stand together as a world culture without doing evil to one another.”

 

I wish more people like Judge Giesbrecht and other white people were as wise as Lori.

Facing the Truth of Canadian Government Policy

 

Based on my reading of the report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (‘TRC’) the harms inflicted on indigenous students were not caused by some bad apples. It was not just the result of nasty sexual predators. That was only part of the harm. The actual harms went far beyond that. Too many Canadians don’t know the story of the residential schools in Canada and too many are completely ignorant of Canadian government policy for more than a century.

As the TRC said on the very first page of its executive summary which itself is 382 pages long:

“For over a century, the central goals of Canada’s Aboriginal policy were to eliminate Aboriginal governments; ignore Aboriginal rights; terminate the Treaties; and, through a process of assimilation, cause Aboriginal peoples to cease to exist as distinct legal, social, cultural, religious and racial entities in Canada. The establishment and operation of residential schools were a central element of this policy, which can best be described as “cultural genocide”.”

 

That is certainly an attention grabbing first paragraph. It should be enough to set aside puerile presumptions of good intent. Canada was not filled with “good intent” when it started Indian Residential Schools nor was it when it operated those schools through contractors consisting largely of various church groups. The churches too were not filled with “good intent” either. That does not mean there was no good intent. There were some sincere people with good intent in the system. They were just not as abundant as we might have hoped. It was the system that caused most of the harm. Not bad apples.

Some people were startled by the use of the expression “cultural genocide” in the TRC report.   How could Canada be guilty of that? Others thought the TRC did not go far enough. They wished the report had not prefixed their indictment with the word “cultural.” These people thought Canada’s actions were just plain “genocide”.

The fact is the TRC was under legal constraints. It had obtained legal advice that it could not allege anyone was guilty of genocide because that is a crime and only a court of law can find criminal guilt and only after a trial at which the accused is represented by counsel, has the right to submit evidence and cross examine witnesses speaking against their interests.  The TRC was not a court. It was a tribunal or commission.  This is what the TRC said,

 

“Physical genocide is mass killing of the members of a targeted group, and biological genocide is the destruction of the group’s reproductive capacity. Cultural genocide is the destruction of those structures and practices that allow the group to continue as a group. States that engage in cultural genocide set out to destroy the political and social institutions of the targeted group.  Land is seized, and populations are forcibly transferred and their movement restricted. Languages are banned. Spiritual leaders are persecuted, spiritual practices are forbidden, and objects of spiritual value are confiscated and destroyed.  And most significantly, to the issue at hand, families are disrupted to prevent transmission of cultural values and identity from one generation to the next.

In dealing with Aboriginal people, Canada did all these things.”

 

The TRC really did not pull any punches!

The government estimated that 150,000 students attended the Indian Residential Schools. Those schools and the students inside them, were a vital part of Canada’s program to force assimilation on the First Nations people of Canada against their will. It was not just an ugly chapter in its history. It was a vital part of what Canada was all about it. It is, and continues to be, a vital part of who Canadians are. Canadians must face that ugly truth.

African American novelist, James Baldwin was one of the sharpest critics of racism. We could all learn a lot from him. As he said, “Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced.”

That is what Canada and Canadians must do.

It wasn’t a few bad apples that caused the problem. It was the tree.

“It’s time to Move On”

 

Retired Manitoba Provincial Court Judge recently wrote an article in the Winnipeg Sun recently in which he advised as follows

“The dead should be appropriately honoured, but we should be mindful that some opportunists will exploit these dead children for financial and political gain. The residential school story has now been exhaustively told. Canadians have heard it — and we get it. We have sympathized, and billions of dollars have been paid by people, most of whom weren’t alive then, to people who mostly weren’t either.  It is time to move on.”

 

This is wrong in so many ways it is difficult to count them. First, he is wrong. Canadians don’t “get it.” That is the problem. If they did get it, then we would not be in a situation where so many of the calls to action of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (‘TRC’) would have gone unheeded.

It depends on how you count. According to the National Post:

“In June 2015, members of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) presented 94 Calls to Action that would help “redress the legacy of residential schools and advance the process of Canadian reconciliation” with Indigenous peoples. Months later, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau confirmed his government’s commitment to implement every single one. Six years later, how many of those Calls to Action have been fully implemented? Based on information in government documents, CBC’s Beyond 94 and research done by the Yellowhead Institute of Ryerson University, the National Post’s Christopher Nardi compiled a list of all the recommendations that have been completely enacted (13), those for which the government has taken some steps (60) and those where no real steps have been made.”

 

In the opinion of others, the total is much lower. How many people have you talked to about how Canada is doing? Or me? I suspect not many. Why? Let’s be honest. Few care. Contrary to what Judge Giesbrecht says, few have sympathized. If they did, the government would have acted.

What is most egregious about these remarks from Judge Giesbrecht is the statement, “It is time to move on.”  That is the one I have heard over and over again. That is because it such an easy comment for those insulated from the harms to make. It costs them or us nothing. Judges from their lofty benches or comfortable pews far from the pain and suffering don’t see the hurt. It is not real to them.

It is time for white male privilege to move on.  White male privilege blinds even people like Judge Giesbrecht. As a result of undeniable residential school trauma indigenous people have suffered effects that have cascaded through the generations. For privileged white men to suggest they should “get over it” or “move on”, is either incredibly wooden-headed, or wooden-hearted. Or both!

Criminal conditions

 

Judge Brian Giesbrecht in his Winnipeg Sun article, said so many children in residential schools because:

“Disease took many from every demographic, but Indigenous people suffered most. They died mainly in their home communities, where the Grim Reaper was always close by. Infected children entered residential schools, and infected others. Many died”.

 

All of that is true. Yet such true statements deflect our attention from the real truth. Some people at the time (not with the wisdom of hindsight or with 21st century sensitivities), described conditions at residential schools as “criminal.”  The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (‘TRC’) explained it this way:

“The federal government knowingly chose not to provide schools with enough money to ensure that kitchens and dining rooms were properly equipped, that cooks were properly trained, and, most significantly, that food was purchased in sufficient quantity and quality for growing children. It was a decision that left thousands of Aboriginal children vulnerable to disease.”

 

In other words, it was a direct result of Canada’s policies that so many indigenous children suffered from diseases. Poor kitchens with poor food supplies were just one of such policy decisions. Canada, and Canadians, cannot use this as an excuse for what happened. Canada controlled the situation. It made the decisions that result in these conditions. Canada is responsible.

As the TRC said,

“…it is clear that until the 1950s, the schools were the sites of an ongoing tuberculosis crisis. Tuberculosis accounted for just less than 50% of the recorded deaths…The tuberculosis health crisis in schools was part of a broader Aboriginal health crisis that was set in motion by colonial policies that separated Aboriginal people from their land, thereby disrupting their economies and their food supplies. This crisis was particularly intense on the Canadian prairies. Numerous federal government policies contributed to the undermining of Aboriginal healthDuring a period of starvation, rations were withheld from bands in an effort to force them to abandon the lands that they had initially selected for their reserves. In making the treaties, the government had promised to provide assistance to First Nations to allow them to transition from hunting to farming. This aid was slow in coming and inadequate on arrival.  Restrictions in the Indian Act made it difficult for First Nations farmers to sell their produce or borrow money to invest in technology. Reserve land was often agriculturally unproductive. Reserve housing was poor, overcrowded, sanitation was inadequate, and access to clean water was limited. Under these conditions tuberculosis flourished. Those people it did not kill were often severely weakened and likely to succumb to measles, smallpox, and other infectious diseases”.

The direct effect of Canadian policy was to make conditions in the schools difficult for children and easy for diseases.

Schools were no place to send children

 

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (‘TRC’) , after looking at all the evidence, not conspiracy theories, as Judge Giesbrecht would have us believe, concluded that “the badly built and poorly maintained schools constituted serious fire hazards. Defective fire fighting equipment exacerbated the risk and the schools were fitted with dangerous and inadequate fire escapes.” Not a good place to send children, but many indigenous parents were left with no choice. They had to send their children there.

The TRC determined that “at least fifty-three schools were destroyed by fire. There were at least 170 additional fires. At least forty students died in residential school fires.” The schools were no place to send children.

Here is an excerpt from the TRC report on physical conditions in residential schools:

” Well into the twentieth century, recommendations for improvements went unheeded, and dangerous and forbidden practices were widespread and entrenched. In the interests of cost containment, the Canadian government placed the lives of students and staff at risk for 130 years.

         The buildings were not only fire traps. They were incubators of disease. Rather than helping combat the tuberculosis crisis in the broader Aboriginal community, the poor condition of the schools served to intensify it. The 1906 annual report of Dr. Peter Bryce, the chief medical officer for Indian Affairs, observed that “the Indian  population of Canada has a mortality rate of more than double that of the whole population, and in some provinces, more than three times.”  Tuberculosis was the prevalent cause of death.”

 

As a result for Judge Brian Giesbrecht to say, as he did in his Winnipeg Sun article, that the cause of so many people dying in residential schools was the fault of a disease, and not the people in Canada who created and maintained that system that lead directly to great harm on indigenous children is not disingenuous, it is pathetic. And then to suggest as Judge Giesbrecht did, “We should take a look at the history,” is to demonstrate colossal condescension coupled with ignorance. Not a very good combination. As if he knows history that others don’t.

The fact is As Dr. Pryce reported to the government of Canada, the death rate of children in residential schools far exceeded that of the general population. Why is that? I think the answer is obvious—Canada just did not care about the indigenous children. They were not worth the expense of proper care.

Suffering Olympics

A wise friend of mine made a very important point. He said taking children away from their parents without consent in itself was the “greatest abuse.” You really don’t have to rail on about anything else (like I have been doing and will continue to do).  After all, according to the UN convention on Genocide that is enough to constitute genocide.

I would just put it a little differently.  Taking children away from their parents without parental consent is certainly enough to generate outrage. Yet, there are so many other egregious abuses: e.g. starving children in those schools; putting the children into what were literally fire traps; using children as forced labour instead of educating them; physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; shredding their self-esteem and denigrating their parents and their culture; bullying children and hence teaching the children that this was the way to treat their children; robbing children of the opportunity to learn how to take care of children from their parents which led directly to the effects of residential schools cascading through the generations which in turn made it impossible to do what so many blind privileged white people want them to do-i.e. “get over it.”

I don’t want to get into a suffering Olympics where we have to rate the sins when each one itself should be what the Catholics call a mortal sin. I find it impossible to say which is the “greatest abuse” when there is such a long line of horrors. Besides what is the point?

The real point is what are we going to do about it?

 

Rampaging Tuberculosis

 

Judge Giesbrecht in his recent article in the Winnipeg Sun, blamed tuberculosis for the deaths of indigenous children. He said, “Tuberculosis was a major killer, and it didn’t spare children.” That is true, but it hardly gets Canada off the hook. Why did tuberculosis sicken and kill so many more indigenous children than children in the general population? That is the  question that Judge Giesbrecht dodged.

The truth is that the high death rates were a direct result of Canadian policy.

The TRC report chastised the conditions in schools that led to a tuberculosis crisis:

The tuberculosis health crisis at the schools was part of a broader Aboriginal health crisis that was set in motion by colonial policies that separated Aboriginal people form their land their land, thereby disrupting their economies and their food supplies. This crisis was particularly intense on the Canadian prairies. Numerous federal government policies contributed to the undermining of Aboriginal health. During a period of starvation, rations were withheld from bands in an effort to force them to abandon the lands they had initially selected for their reserves. In making the Treaties, the government had promised to provide assistance to First Nations to make a transition from hunting to farming. This aid was slow in coming and inadequate on arrival. Restrictions in the Indian Act made it difficult for First Nations farmers to sell their produce or borrow money to invest in technology. Reserve land was often agriculturally unproductive. Reserve housing was poor and crowded, sanitation was inadequate, and access to clean water was limited.  Under these conditions, tuberculosis flourished. Those people it did not kill were often severely weakened and likely to succumb to measles, small pox, and other infectious diseases.

 

Canadians should also recall what we have learned from a professor of medicine at the University of Manitoba, James Daschuk who pointed out that the prairie of North America, before the arrival of Europeans was one of the best places in the world to live, from a health perspective. The ecology was astonishingly abundant, particularly when it came to bison. It has been estimated there were about 60 million or more bison on the plains before they were decimated after Europeans arrived. Indigenous people were shocked at how sickly Europeans were!

Everything depended on the food provided by bison. The calories provided by bison were astonishing. Some have considered it the miracle food. It was one of the greatest food resources on the planet, and the Indigenous people were the beneficiaries. Its ultimate loss was one of the world’s greatest ecological disasters ever! This was a major step on what Anthony Hall called the journey from ecocide to genocide.

As James Daschuk described it, “Studies of skeletons have shown that, in the mid-nineteenth century, peoples on the plains were perhaps the tallest and best-nourished population in the world.”] The Plains of North America supported one the world’s great civilizations, but because they were blinded by the bias of white supremacy, the Europeans failed to appreciate this. But things spiralled into decline after the First Nations of Canada made Treaties with the white supremacists of Canada.

In their home communities, the TRC reported, many students had been raised on food that their parents had hunted, fished, or harvested. “These meals were different from the European diets served at the schools. This change in diet added to the students’ sense of disorientation.” It wasn’t just that the food at the schools was bad, although it certainly was, it was so different from what the children were accustomed to that they suffered as a result. Bernard Catcheway reported to the TRC that “we had to eat all our food even though we didn’t like it. There were lots of times there I seen other students that threw up, and they were forced to eat their own, their own vomit.”

The schools were also places where the only thing that flourished were diseases like tuberculosis. A report from the National Association of Principals and Administrators of Indian Residences concluded,

“In the years that the Churches have been involved in the administration of the schools, there has been a steady deterioration in essential services. Year after year, complaints demands, and requests for improvements have, in the main, fallen upon deaf ears.

The Canadian government was responsible for the condition of those schools. The Canadian government let down the students there who had been ripped out of their homes, often without parental consent. Canadians cannot get away with their neglect by blaming it on disease. Canadians did everything they could to ensure that disease was rampant in the schools they insisted indigenous people attend.